AI in STrategic decision making
Leads: Michael S. Neiberg
michael.neiberg@armywarcollege.edu
Office of the Dean
Dr. Charles Pfaff
charles.pfaff@armywarcollege.com
Strategic Research & Assessment Department
Focus: This Independent Research Project (IRP) has two main goals. First, it will allow our students to apply AI to a specific, strategic problem set, which will be decided in partnership with EUCOM leadership. Second, the IRP will help bridge the gap between AI's immense technological power and the essential skills our graduates need to use AI ethically, responsibly, and effectively. While the study includes technical AI exploration, its core purpose is to investigate AI’s meaning for defense and strategy now and in the future. This broad research will cover the historical, conceptual, ethical, legal, and operational dimensions of integrating AI into strategic frameworks. By deepening our understanding of AI’s transformative potential, we will help shape a responsible and sustainable future for its use in strategic thinking.
Sponsor: EUCOM CIO Office
AI and AXI as a Symbolic Partner for the Warfighter in Achieving Decision Advantage/Dominance
Lead: William J. Barry, PhD
william.barry.civ@armywarcollege.edu
Center for Strategic Leadership
Focus: This IRP focuses on applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Axiomatic Intelligence (AXI) to the warfighter to a strategic problem set determined by Army Futures Command leadership. This project will seek to exploit the initiative to use augmenting technologies to seize and retain decision and information advantage in adversary.
Sponsor: Next Generation Command and Control (NGG2) CFT- Data –Driven (Algorithmic) Warfare
Military AND society
Lead: Dr. Neil Snyder
neil.snyder.mil@armywarcollege.edu
Dept. of National Security and Strategy (DNSS)
Focus: This IRP examines Americans' relationship with their military. The AY25 IRP on the Military and Society investigated the factors affecting Americans’ propensity to serve and offered recommendations to address the armed services’ perennial recruitment challenge. For AY26, we build on that research and continue to explore contemporary concerns that affect military accessions, while also producing original research on the animating issues of contemporary American civil-military relations.
Sponsor: Director for Military Community and Family Policy (OUSD P&R)
Army Reserve 2.0: A DOTMLPF-P Relook to Transform the Army Reserve to Meet Future Demands
Lead: COL Stephen Messenger
stephen.messenger.mil@armywarcollege.edu
Dept. of Distance Education (DDE)
Focus: This integrated research project will evaluate the 2025 Army Transformation Initiative through the lens of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), leveraging DOTMLPF-P to assess the readiness, modernization, and transformation requirements needed for the Reserve Component to support large-scale combat operations (LSCO). It aims to generate actionable recommendations to re-balance the Total Army, close institutional gaps that hinder LSCO preparedness, and align Reserve Component reforms with the Army’s 2025 Transformation Initiative—ensuring strategic depth and resilience are restored before the next war, not after.
Sponsor: Deputy Chief of the Army Reserve
Deterring China and Creating a Competitive Advantage
Leads: Dr. Antulio Echevarria
antulio.echevarria@armywarcollege.edu
Center for Strategic Competition
Dr. Larry Goodson
larry.goodson@armywarcollege.edu
Dept. of National Security and Strategy (DNSS)
MAJ Brennan Deveraux
brennan.deveraux@armywarcollege.edu
Strategic Studies Institute (SSI)
Focus: This integrated research project (IRP) is a direct follow up to the academic year 2025 Understanding, Deterring, and Preparing for a Great-Power War in the Twenty-First Century IRP. The specific focus is on deterring China and positioning the United States to have a competitive advantage over its pacing threat. The project is structured around numerous guiding questions developed in consultation with the sponsor that include examining alternative deterrence strategies, non-conventional gray-zone operations, India’s role in the Pacific, and the impact of new capabilities.
Sponsor: The Vice Chief of Staff of the Army
Ukraine War Lessons Learned
Leads: Dr. John Nagl
john.nagl.civ@armywarcollege.edu
Dept. of Military Strategy, Planning, and Operations (DMSPO)
COL Chase Metcalf
chase.metcalf@armywarcollege.edu
Dept. of Military Strategy, Planning, and Operations (DMSPO)
Focus: Examine combat effectiveness of Russian and Ukrainian militaries in the current conflict across all warfighting functions. Aim will be to shape doctrine, training, and Professional Military Education of Army leaders.
Sponsor: G2, US Army Training and Doctrine Command
The Middle East in Great Power Conflict
Lead: Dr. Jacob Stoil
jacob.stoil.civ@armywarcollege.edu
Strategic Research & Assessment Department
Focus: This IRP examines why Great Power conflict has expanded to include campaigning in the Middle East regardless of region in which the conflict is centered and use this as a lens to explore the role the region may play in future wars.
Sponsor: ARCENT