Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Army University
Search
Search
Search
AMSC
News
About
Educational Programs
Registration and Support
Leader Up Podcast
Recommended Reading List
USANCOA
USAWOCC
Warrant Officer Overview
Leadership
History
Campus Information
Courses
Order of the Eagle Rising Society
Strength in Knowledge WO Journal
Contact Us
CGSC
About
Leadership
Degree Programs
Scholars Programs
CGSS
SAMS
SCP
SMC
CARL
CASO
Registrar
Student Achievement
Contact
USAWC
ASEP
About
General Officer Education
Nominative Leader Education
AU Press
USAHEC
CMH
Home
News
View
Mar 30, 2026
Unresolved Strategic Rivalries by US Combatant Command
Share
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Link
More
References & Sources
Graphic created by research assistant Rich Rehberg.
Primary source (rivalry data — Table F.1)
Mazarr, Michael J., Alexis Dale-Huang, John Deak, Gregory Weider Fauerbach, Stacie Goddard, Timothy R. Heath, and Joshua Shifrinson, The Fates of Nations: Varieties of Success and Failure for Great Powers in Long-Term Rivalries, RAND Corporation, RR-A2611-2, 2024. ISBN 978-1-9774-1269-0.
www.rand.org/t/RRA2611-2
Underlying rivalry database
William R. Thompson and David R. Dreyer, Handbook of International Rivalries, 1494–2010, CQ Press, 2012 (cited in the report as Thompson and Dreyer, 2013) — the source of the 165 bilateral rivalries coded in RAND Table F.1.
Basemap — U.S. combatant command areas of responsibility
Unified Combatant Commands map, based on the US Department of Defense Unified Command Plan; image via Wikimedia Commons (
Unified_Combatant_Commands_map.svg
).
Selection criteria & scope note
“Unresolved” competitions are the 42 of 165 rivalries in Table F.1 that record a start year but no end year. Each is grouped by the geographic combatant command in whose area of responsibility the rivalry primarily plays out; cross-AOR rivalries (e.g., India–Pakistan, Russia–United States) are assigned by geographic locus.
RETURN TO TOP